From the category archives:

Search Engines

No More Nofollow - U Comment and I Follow!

by TheMadHat on August 20, 2007

If you're new here, you must subscribe to my RSS feed, or I will hunt you down. Thanks for visiting!

I Follow Comments! Screw you Google. I believe if you have something to say you should be recognized for your contribution. Nofollow is a great idea in theory but I think it’s the wrong way to battle spam. It doesn’t work for one thing, and for another it goes against the whole idea of the web. So if you’ve got something worthwhile to contribute to any of my posts you will receive some link love for it.

My Akismet does a decent job of blocking most of the spam, and I moderate comments on a daily basis; it isn’t very hard when you have the massive volume of comments that I have :b. I’ve installed DoFollow which is a nifty little plugin that removes the no-follow attributes from Wordpress blogs. You can specify how long comment links stay nofollowed and/or if only registered users are allowed this feature. I have mine set at 24 hours and then nofollow will be removed.

I know this is painting a giant red bullseye on my site for spammers, but right now I’d rather deal with a little spam and get some conversations going. One caveat; “Nice post”, “I agree” comments will either be quickly deleted or manually nofollowed. So for everyone that’s commented thus far, and for those of you that will contribute in the future, I’ll give you a little something back for doing so.

For those of you who feel like sticking it to the man, here is a list of plugins that remove nofollow and here is the Dofollow D-List that lists other blogs joining the Dofollow movement (this list appears to have originated at GeekySpeaky). I’d also like to give props to Randa Clay Design for the logo.

Bring it on trackback spammers…I can handle it!

{ 21 comments }

This Wikipedia phenomenon is getting way out of hand. I know it’s been said before many times. Graywolf had an interesting post some time ago that stuck in my mind about Google and their love affair with Wikipedia that I decided to expand upon. I set my scrapers interns to work. Here is the process I went through (the data was pulled on August 12th):

From Wordtracker I pulled the top 1000 long term keywords (last 90 days) and the top 1000 short term keywords (last 48 hours) with offensive terms removed. I downloaded the buzz list from the SEOmoz popular searches tool. I then de-duped and cleaned the list and it came to a final count of 1,792 keywords. I needed to compare this to some other sites with a high level of “domain authority” so I also had my scrapers neighbors kids run rankings for About.com, Amazon, Craigslist, eBay, and MySpace. First Conclusion: Wikipedia has secret agents inside Google. Not only are they having a love affair with Google but MSN as well. They’re just married to Yahoo as they get the least amount of action from them. See the final results for yourself:
 
 
Google

Wikipedia Google Rankings
 
 
Yahoo

Wikipedia Yahoo Rankings
 
 
MSN

Wikipedia MSN Rankings
 
 

Holy Shit Captain Kirk! Wikipedia is the most or nearly the most relevant for almost half of all my searches! I bet Google can even search for Spock and find him faster than you! Give me a break Google. And Yahoo. And MSN. Wikipedia is full of crap all over the place. Where is Encyclopedia Britannica? Wouldn’t they also be a little bit relevant for something? Let’s look at some terms Wikipedia ranks for in the top 3:

* [search engine optimization] - Currently #1 on every engine and the most relevant source on SEO that exists. Sorry SearchEngineWatch. I guess you and even Danny Sullivan are much less relevant than Wikipedia on SEO.

* [SEO] - See above.

* [text messages] - okay, I suppose in case I don’t know what a text message is.

* [boys] - That’s creepy.

* [girls] - “A girl is a female child, as opposed to a boy, a male child.” Thanks. That deserves a #2 spot.

* [firefox] - (MSN) obviously the Wikipedia entry is more relevant than the actual Firefox page.

* [cheerleaders] - You really think I want to know what a cheerleader is?

* [lap dance] - See above

* [internet] - what is this thing?

* [art] - I’d like to buy some art. Or look at some art. Nope, I get to find out that “Art is a (product of) human activity, made with the intention of stimulating the human senses”

* [booty] - what?

Obviously this could go on and on. I think it’s time for all the search engines to take a hard look at the value of Wikipedia and what a trusted domain really is.

** If you would like to download all the data (terms, ranks, etc) from this experiment, you may grab the rar file here.

{ 9 comments }